Special:Random

We have had many, many inquires^[1] as to how we select topics for our BLOTTs. One technique is to use the Special:Random feature of Wikipedia.

^[1] Well, one person acted kinda curious, but they may have just wanted us to go away.

Click the above link compulsively over and over and over and over.
Spend no more than 3 seconds per page.
If the topic looks BLOTT-worthy (see below), take a screen shot (or for really cool stuff, take a full page shoot using Awesome Screen Shot (Chrome).
Cogitate, filter, drink coffee, get the advice of the Elders of WLBOTT
Proceed with caution.

Would this Wiki page, in and of itself, make a good BLOTT, assuming available resources and a nice check from the National Endowment for the Arts?

If you would like to suggest a BLOTT, please contact
seriousInquiriesOnly@wlbott.com

After visiting thousands of Special:Random sites, some patterns emerge:

about half the articles are sports related, mostly obscure soccer, rugby, and cricket teams, team members, tournaments
lots of obscure bands and musicians
lots of trains and train lines
lots of obscure and bloated political and religious figures, actresses and actors, civil servants, coaches….
WLBOTT thinks that research funds should be provided relative to the relationship between narcissism and frequency of Wikipedia articles. We are not suggesting that we would produce results, but only that funding should be provided.
lots of beetle and moth species